1828.5.
(a) At the hearing on the petition for appointment of a limited conservator for an adult alleged to have a developmental disability, the court shall do all of the following:(1) Inquire into the nature and extent of the general intellectual functioning of the person alleged to have developmental disabilities.
(2) Evaluate the extent of the impairment of the person’s adaptive behavior.
(3) Ascertain the person’s capacity to care for
themselves and their property.
(4) (A) Inquire as to what whether less restrictive alternatives to conservatorship have been tried and considered or attempted and, if attempted, for how long. Alternatives shall include Less restrictive alternatives shall include, but not be limited to, the use of supported decisionmaking. Counsel
decisionmaking or the appointment of an authorized representative. Petitioner shall state on the record any reasons why the alternatives less restrictive alternatives have not been considered or attempted or are not appropriate.
(B) For purposes of this paragraph, “supported decisionmaking” means a process of supporting and accommodating the person with a developmental disability to enable the person to make and communicate life decisions, including, but not limited to, decisions about where to live, what services, supports, and medical care to receive, whom to live with, and where to work, without impeding the self-determination of the person.
(5) Inquire into the qualifications, abilities, and capabilities of the person seeking appointment as limited conservator.
(6) If a report by the regional center, in accordance with Section 1827.5, has not been filed in court because the proposed limited conservatee withheld consent to assessment by the regional center, the court shall determine the reason
consent was withheld.
(b) If the court finds that the proposed limited conservatee possesses the capacity to manage their property as a reasonably prudent person, the court shall dismiss the petition for appointment of a limited conservator.
(c) If the court finds that the proposed limited conservatee lacks the capacity to perform some, but not all, of the tasks necessary to provide properly for their own personal needs for physical health, food, clothing, or shelter, or to manage their own financial resources, the court shall appoint a limited conservator for the person or the estate or the person and the estate.
(d) If the court finds that the proposed limited conservatee lacks the capacity to perform
all of the tasks necessary to provide properly for their own personal needs for physical health, food, clothing, or shelter, or to manage their own financial resources, the court shall appoint either a conservator or a limited conservator for the person or the estate, or the person and the estate.
(e) The court shall define the powers and duties of the limited conservator so as to permit the adult with a developmental disability to provide self-care or to manage their financial resources commensurate with their ability to do so.
(f) Prior to the appointment of a limited conservator for the person or estate or person and estate of an adult with a developmental disability, the court shall inform the proposed limited conservatee of the nature and purpose of the
limited conservatorship proceeding, that the appointment of a limited conservator for their person or estate or person and estate will result in the transfer of certain rights set forth in the petition and the effect of that transfer, the identity of the person who has been nominated as the limited conservator, that the person has a right to oppose the proceeding, and that the person has a right to have the matter tried by jury. After communicating that information to the person and prior to the appointment of a limited conservator, the court shall consult the person to determine their opinion concerning the appointment.