Amended
IN
Assembly
August 19, 2016 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 07, 2016 |
Introduced by Senators De León, Allen, and Lara |
February 19, 2016 |
(1)Existing law authorizes the board of an air pollution control or air quality management district to adopt a market-based incentive program as an element of a district’s plan for the attainment of the state or federal ambient air quality standards. Existing law requires a district board, within 5 years from the date of the adoption of a market-based incentive program, to commence public hearings to reassess the program and, within 7 years from the date of the air district’s initial adoption of the program, to ratify specified findings with the concurrence of the State Air Resources Board.
This bill instead would require a district board to submit to the State Air Resources Board for review and approval the district’s plan for attainment
or a revision to that plan, as specified. The bill also would require a district board to submit to the state board for review and approval the district’s market-based incentive program and any revisions to that program, as specified. The bill would prescribe specified actions for the state board to take if the state board determines that a plan for attainment, a revision of a plan for attainment, a market-based incentive program, or a revision to a market-based incentive program do not comply with law. By adding to the duties of air districts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(2)Existing
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:
(1) Several regions in California suffer from some of the worst air quality in the United States.
(2) While traditional command and control air quality regulatory programs are effective in cleaning up the air, other options for improvement in air quality, such as market-based incentive programs, may be explored, provided that those programs result in
greater emission reductions while ensuring disadvantaged communities, as identified pursuant to Section 39711, are not disproportionately impacted by pollution.
(3) The purpose of this section is to establish requirements under which a district board may adopt market-based incentive programs in a manner that achieves the greatest air quality improvement while strengthening the state’s economy and preserving jobs.
(b) (1) A district board may adopt a market-based incentive program as an element of the district’s plan for the attainment of the state or federal ambient air quality standards.
(2) A market-based incentive program that satisfies the conditions in this section may substitute for current command and control regulations and future air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted as part of the district’s plan for attainment, and may be implemented in lieu of some or all of the control measures adopted by the district pursuant to Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 40910) of Part 3.
(c) In adopting rules
to implement a market-based incentive program, a district board shall, at the time that the rules
are adopted, make express findings, and shall, at the time that the rules are submitted to the state board, submit appropriate information to substantiate the basis for making the findings that each of the following conditions is met on an overall districtwide basis:
(1) The program will result in an equivalent or greater reduction in emissions at equivalent or less cost compared with current command and control regulations and future air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted as part of the district’s plan for attainment.
(2) The program will
provide a level of enforcement and monitoring, to ensure compliance with emission reduction requirements, comparable with command and control air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted by the district for inclusion in the district’s plan for attainment.
(3) The program will establish a baseline methodology that provides appropriate credit so that stationary sources of air pollution that have been modified prior to implementation of the program to reduce stationary source emissions are treated equitably.
(4) The program will not result in a greater loss of jobs or more significant shifts from higher to lower skilled jobs, on an overall districtwide basis, than that
which would exist under command and control air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted as part of the district’s plan for attainment. A finding of compliance with this requirement may be made in the same manner as the analyses made by the district to meet the requirements of Section 40728.5.
(5) The program will promote the privatization of compliance and the availability of data in computer format. The district shall endeavor to provide sources with the option to keep records by way of electronic or computer data storage systems, rather than mechanical devices, such as strip chart recorders.
(6) The program will not in any manner delay, postpone, or otherwise
hinder district compliance with Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 40910) of Part 3.
(7) The program will not result in disproportionate impacts, measured on an aggregate basis, on those stationary sources included in the program compared to other permitted stationary sources in the district’s plan for attainment.
(d) (1) A district’s plan for attainment or plan revision submitted to the state board shall achieve equivalent emission reductions and reduced cost and job impacts compared to current command and control regulations and future air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted as part of the district’s plan for attainment. A
district shall not implement a market-based incentive program or any revisions to an adopted market-based incentive program unless the state board has determined that the plan or plan revision complies with this paragraph.
(2) (A)A plan or plan revision shall meet the provisions of subdivision (c) and Section 40440.1 if applicable. The state board shall
review, approve, disapprove, or amend and approve the plan or plan revision prior to program implementation, and shall make its determination not later than
60 days from the date of submission of the plan or plan revision.
(B)(i)If the state board determines that a plan or plan revision submitted pursuant to this paragraph does not comply with this section, the state board within 60 days of the date of the submission of the plan or plan revision, shall do all of the following:
(I)Notify the district.
(II)Revise the plan or plan revision so that the plan or plan revision complies with this section.
(III)Approve the plan or plan revision.
(ii)If the state board approves a plan or plan revision pursuant to this subparagraph, the plan or plan revision shall take effect immediately and be binding on the district.
(3) (A)Upon the adoption of rules to implement the program in accordance with subdivision (c), the district shall submit the rules to the state
board. The state board shall, within 90 days from the date of submission,
determine whether the rules meet the requirements of this section and Section 40440.1, if applicable. This paragraph does not prohibit the district from implementing the program upon the approval of the plan or plan revision and prior to submission of the rules.
(B)(i)If the state board determines that a district
rule does not comply with this section, the state board, within 60 days of the date of the submission of the rule, shall do all of the following:
(I)Notify the district.
(II)Revise the rule so that the rule complies with this section.
(III)Adopt the rule.
(ii)If the state board approves a rule pursuant to this subparagraph, the rule shall take effect immediately and have the same legal force and effect as a district rule.
(e) Within five years from the date of the adoption of a market-based incentive program, the district board shall commence public
hearings to reassess the program and shall, not later than seven years from the date of the district’s initial adoption of the program, ratify the findings required pursuant to paragraphs (1), (2), (5), and (6) of subdivision (c) and the district’s compliance with Section 40440.1, if applicable, with the concurrence of the state board. If the district board fails to ratify the findings within the seven-year period, the district board shall make appropriate revisions to the district’s plan for attainment.
(f) The district board shall reassess a market-based incentive program if the market price of emission trading units exceeds a predetermined level set by the district board. The district board may take action to revise the program. A predetermined market price review level shall be set in a public hearing in consideration of the costs of command and control air quality measures that would otherwise have been adopted as part of the district’s
plan for attainment, costs and factors submitted by interested parties, and any other factors considered appropriate by the district board. The district board may revise the market price review level for emission trading units every three years during attainment plan updates required under Section 40925. In revising the market price review level, the district board shall consider the factors used in setting the initial market price review level as well as other economic impacts, including the overall impact of the program on job loss, rate of business formation, and rate of business closure.
(g) For sources not included in market-based incentive programs, this section does not apply to, and shall in no way limit, existing district authority to facilitate compliance with particular emission control measures by imposing or authorizing sourcewide emission caps, alternative emission control plans, stationary for mobile source emission trades,
mobile for mobile source emission trades, and similar measures, whether imposed or authorized by rule or permit condition.
(h) This section does not apply to the implementation of market-based transportation control measures
that do not involve emissions trading.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.