Amended
IN
Assembly
May 27, 2016 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 14, 2016 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
March 28, 2016 |
Introduced by Assembly Member Mayes |
February 19, 2016 |
It is the intent of the Legislature that the state identify and recommend the most cost-effective water efficiency measures that achieve the greatest reduction in water use and produce net environmental benefits that outweigh any unintended adverse environmental impacts.
As used in this chapter:
(a)“Evapotranspiration” means a loss of water from the soil, including losses resulting from evaporation and losses resulting from transpiration from the plants growing on the soil.
(b)“Highly efficient consumer appliances and landscape systems” include, but are not limited to, irrigation systems, toilets, showers, pool covers, and clothes washers.
(c)“Public entity” has the same meaning as defined in Section 375 of the Water Code.
(d)“Turfgrass” means any living grass that is
used in fields or yards at a residential or commercial property, private park, athletic field, or public school.
(e)“Unintended adverse environmental impacts” include, but are not limited to, impacts on climate change, net effect on carbon sequestration, increased erosion, and impacts to stormwater runoff.
By December 1, 2017, the commission, in consultation with persons that include, but are not limited to, subject matter experts at the University of California, the California State University, and local water districts, and in cooperation with the State Water Resources Control Board and the Department of Water Resources, shall develop and solicit comments on a proposed report that contains all of the following:
(a)An analysis of the relative costs and benefits of incentives for various water efficiency measures,
including the consideration of the impact of evapotranspiration rates in different hydrological regions of the state. The water efficiency measures considered shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1)Turfgrass removal and replacement with either drought-resistant turfgrass or artificial turf.
(2)Turfgrass removal and replacement with native or drought-tolerant plants.
(3)The use of conservation-based irrigation technology such as smart controllers.
(4)Investments in graywater infrastructure to supply water to outdoor landscapes.
(5)Rebates for highly efficient consumer appliances and landscape systems.
(b)An analysis of any unintended adverse environmental impacts that would result from the water efficiency measures considered pursuant to subdivision (a).
(c)The projected benefits of recommended voluntary water efficiency measures.
By July 1, 2018, the commission shall issue a final report that contains all of the following:
(a)An identification of the most cost-effective incentives for water efficiency measures in terms of water use reduction per dollar spent.
(b)Recommendations to public entities to help them prioritize the most cost-effective solutions for granting incentives or rebates for water efficiency measures.
(c)An analysis of any unintended adverse environmental impacts that would result from the water efficiency measures considered pursuant to subdivision (a).
(d)The projected benefits of recommended voluntary water efficiency measures.