(1) The Political Reform Act of 1974 requires any committee that supports or opposes one or more ballot measures to name and identify itself using a name or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interest of major donors of $50,000 or more in any reference to the committee required by law, including the statement of organization filed by the committee. The act also requires a committee that supports or opposes a ballot measure to print or broadcast its name as part of any advertisement or other paid public statement.
This bill would additionally require a committee that supports or opposes one or more ballot measures to list each major donor of $50,000 or more in descending order based on the amount of the contributions made by the donors to the committee, in any
reference to the committee required by law. A committee that supports or opposes a ballot measure also would be required to print or broadcast the names of the 3 donors who made the highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more to the committee. The bill also would require a donor that is a committee other than a candidate-controlled committee to be identified by the names of 3 donors who made the highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more to that donor committee.
(2) The act requires a broadcast or mass mailing advertisement supporting or opposing a candidate or ballot measure, if paid for by an independent expenditure, to include a disclosure statement that identifies the name of the committee making the independent expenditure and the names of the persons from whom the committee making the independent expenditure has received its 2 highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more during the 12-month period prior to the
expenditure. However, if the committee is able to show that contributions from those 2 highest cumulative contributions were spent for other purposes, then the act requires the committee to disclose the names of the contributors making the next largest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more. A violation of the act is subject to criminal penalties.
The bill would require a broadcast or mass mailing paid for by independent expenditure to identify the names of the persons from whom the committee making the independent expenditure has received its 3, rather than 2, highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more during the 12-month period prior to expenditure and if one of those persons is a committee other than a candidate-controlled committee, then to identify that other committee by the names of the 3 donors who made the highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more to that committee. However, the
The committee paying for the broadcast or mass mailing advertisement would be required to disclose the names of the contributors making the next largest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more, if it can show that the contributions from the 3 donors who made the highest cumulative contributions of $50,000 or more, rather than the 2 highest contributors, to the committee were spent for purposes other than the broadcast or mass mailing advertisement. The bill also would require a broadcast or mass mailing advertisement supporting or opposing a candidate or ballot measure that is paid for by an independent expenditure to include a statement or phrase that clearly identifies the economic or other special interest of the major donors of $50,000 or more, listing the economic or other special interest in descending order based on the amount of contributions made by the respective donor to the committee.
(3) The bill also would make conforming changes regarding the disclosure in advertising for or against a ballot measure which is paid for by a committee of the donors to the committee who have made the 3, rather than 2, highest contributions over $50,000 to two other provisions of the Political Reform Act.
(3)
(4) Existing law makes a violation of the act subject to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties.
The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by placing these penalties on persons who violate the
bill.
(4)
(5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(5)
(6) The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act’s purposes upon a 2/3 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements.
This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.