Bill Text

Bill Information


Add To My Favorites | print page

SB-34 Powerplants: military installations.(2001-2002)

SHARE THIS: share this bill in Facebook share this bill in Twitter
SB34:v98#DOCUMENT

Amended  IN  Senate  April 17, 2001

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2001–2002 1st Ext.

Senate Bill
No. 34

Introduced  by  Senator Knight

February 06, 2001

An act to amend Section 42301.14 of the Health and Safety Code, and An act to add Section 42301.16 to the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Section 21080 of, and to add Section 25556 to, the Public Resources Code, relating to energy resources.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 34, as amended, Knight. Powerplants: military installations.
(1) Existing law provides for the restructuring of California’s electric power industry so that the price for the generation of electricity is determined by a competitive market.
Under existing law, air pollution control districts, air quality management districts, and the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission issue permits for the operation of powerplants.
Existing law authorizes those districts to issue a temporary, expedited, consolidated permit for a thermal powerplant if specified conditions are met, and requires the commission to establish a process for the expedited review of applications to construct and operate powerplants and thermal powerplants and related facilities.
This bill would designate any existing facility sited on, or any new facility proposed to be sited on, an active or closed military installation, which is substantially similar in design and operation to a facility that was approved by the commission before January 1, 2001, to be eligible for expedited review by the commission.
For purposes of air emission permits, the The bill would provide that the siting of an electrical generating facility, pursuant to expedited review by the commission, on an active or closed military installation would be considered a separate stationary source, if that designation is consistent with the state implementation plan. The siting would not be included in the air pollution calculations for military installation operations.
(2) The existing California Environmental Quality Act requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare and certify an environmental impact report on a project that it intends to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect either as proposed or as mitigated.
This bill would exempt from that act the expedited review by the commission of a project for an existing thermal powerplant facility sited on, or a new powerplant facility proposed to be sited on, an active or closed military installation.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.Section 42301.14 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
42301.14.

(a)To the extent permitted by the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 et seq.), and notwithstanding Section 65950 of the Government Code, a district may issue a temporary, expedited, consolidated permit, as provided by Sections 42300.1 and 42301.3, for a powerplant within 60 days after the date of certification of an environmental impact report, within 30 days after the adoption of a negative declaration, or within 30 days after the date of a determination that the project is exempt from Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, if all of the following conditions are met:

(1)The powerplant will emit less than 5 parts per million of oxides of nitrogen averaged over a three-hour period.

(2)The powerplant will operate exclusively under the terms of a contract entered into with the Independent System Operator and approved by the Electricity Oversight Board established pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 334) of Chapter 2.3 of Part 1 of Division 1 of the Public Utilities Code.

(3)The owner or operator of the powerplant shall demonstrate that the powerplant, on average, will displace electrical generation that produces greater air emissions in the same air basin or in a basin that causes air pollution transport into that basin.

(4)The powerplant will be interconnected to the grid in a manner that the Public Utilities Commission, in consultation with the Electricity Oversight Board, has determined will allow the powerplant to provide service to a geographical area of the state that is urgently in need of generation in order to provide reliable electric service. However, nothing in this paragraph affects the authority of the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission over powerplants pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 25500) of Division 15 of the Public Resources Code.

(5)The powerplant will be operated at a location that has the necessary fueling and electrical transmission and distribution infrastructure for its operation.

(6)The owner or operator of the powerplant enters into a binding and enforceable agreement with the district, and where applicable, with the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, which demonstrates either of the following:

(A)That the powerplant will cease to operate and the permit will terminate within three years.

(B)That the powerplant will be modified, replaced, or removed within a period of three years with a combined-cycle powerplant that uses best available control technology and offsets, as determined at the time the combined-cycle plant is constructed, and that complies with all other applicable laws and regulations.

(7)Where applicable, the owner or operator of the powerplant will obtain offsets or, where offsets are unavailable, pay an air emissions mitigation fee to the district based upon the actual emissions from the powerplant, to the district for expenditure by the district pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 44275) of Part 5, to mitigate the emissions from the plant.

(8)It is the intent of the Legislature in this section to encourage the expedited siting of cleaner generating units to address peaking power needs. It is further the intent of the Legislature to require local air quality management districts and air pollution control districts to recognize the critical need for these facilities and the short life span of these facilities in exercising their discretionary authority to apply more restrictive air quality regulations than would otherwise be required by law.

(b)(1)This section may be utilized for the purpose of expediting the siting of electrical generating facilities pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 25500) of Division 15 of the Public Resources Code.

(2)For purposes of this section, the siting of an electrical generating facility, pursuant to Section 25556 of the Public Resources Code, on an active or closed military installation shall be considered a separate stationary source, if that designation is consistent with the state implementation plan. The siting pursuant to this paragraph shall not be included in the air pollution calculations for military installation operations.

(c)This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2004, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2004, deletes or extends that date.

SECTION 1.

 Section 42301.16 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:

42301.16.
 The siting of an electrical generating facility, pursuant to Section 25556 of the Public Resources Code, on an active military installation shall be considered a separate stationary source, if that designation is consistent with the state implementation plan. The siting pursuant to this section shall not be included in the air pollution calculations for military installation operations.

SEC. 2.

 Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code is amended to read:

21080.
 (a) Except as otherwise provided in this division, this division shall apply to discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, including, but not limited to, the enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of zoning variances, the issuance of conditional use permits, and the approval of tentative subdivision maps unless the project is exempt from this division.
(b) This division does not apply to any of the following activities:
(1) Ministerial projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies.
(2) Emergency repairs to public service facilities necessary to maintain service.
(3) Projects undertaken, carried out, or approved by a public agency to maintain, repair, restore, demolish, or replace property or facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of a disaster in a disaster-stricken area in which a state of emergency has been proclaimed by the Governor pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 8550) of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
(4) Specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency.
(5) Projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves.
(6) Actions undertaken by a public agency relating to any thermal powerplant site or facility, including the expenditure, obligation, or encumbrance of funds by a public agency for planning, engineering, or design purposes, or for the conditional sale or purchase of equipment, fuel, water (except groundwater), steam, or power for a thermal powerplant, if the powerplant site and related facility will be the subject of an environmental impact report, negative declaration, or other document, prepared pursuant to a regulatory program certified pursuant to Section 21080.5, which will be prepared by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, by the Public Utilities Commission, or by the city or county in which the powerplant and related facility would be located if the environmental impact report, negative declaration, or document includes the environmental impact, if any, of the action described in this paragraph.
(7) Activities or approvals necessary to the bidding for, hosting or staging of, and funding or carrying out of, an Olympic games under the authority of the International Olympic Committee, except for the construction of facilities necessary for the Olympic games.
(8) The establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of (A) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits, (B) purchasing or leasing supplies, equipment, or materials, (C) meeting financial reserve needs and requirements, (D) obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas, or (E) obtaining funds necessary to maintain those intracity transfers as are authorized by city charter. The public agency shall incorporate written findings in the record of any proceeding in which an exemption under this paragraph is claimed setting forth with specificity the basis for the claim of exemption.
(9) All classes of projects designated pursuant to Section 21084.
(10) A project for the institution or increase of passenger or commuter services on rail or highway rights-of-way already in use, including modernization of existing stations and parking facilities.
(11) A project for the institution or increase of passenger or commuter service on high-occupancy vehicle lanes already in use, including the modernization of existing stations and parking facilities.
(12) Facility extensions not to exceed four miles in length which are required for the transfer of passengers from or to exclusive public mass transit guideway or busway public transit services.
(13) A project for the development of a regional transportation improvement program, the state transportation improvement program, or a congestion management program prepared pursuant to Section 65089 of the Government Code.
(14) Any project or portion thereof located in another state which will be subject to environmental impact review pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 4321 et seq.) or similar state laws of that state. Any emissions or discharges that would have a significant effect on the environment in this state are subject to this division.
(15) Projects undertaken by a local agency to implement a rule or regulation imposed by a state agency, board, or commission under a certified regulatory program pursuant to Section 21080.5. Any site-specific effect of the project which was not analyzed as a significant effect on the environment in the plan or other written documentation required by Section 21080.5 is subject to this division.
(16) The expedited review, pursuant to Section 25556, by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission of a project for an existing thermal powerplant facility sited on, or a new powerplant facility proposed to be sited on, an active or closed military installation.
(c) If a lead agency determines that a proposed project, not otherwise exempt from this division, would not have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall adopt a negative declaration to that effect. The negative declaration shall be prepared for the proposed project in either of the following circumstances:
(1) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
(2) An initial study identifies potentially significant effects on the environment, but (A) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (B) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment.
(d) If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report shall be prepared.
(e) (1) For the purposes of this section and this division, substantial evidence includes fact, a reasonable assumption predicated upon fact, or expert opinion supported by fact.
(2) Substantial evidence is not argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts that do not contribute to, or are not caused by, physical impacts on the environment.
(f) As a result of the public review process for a mitigated negative declaration, including administrative decisions and public hearings, the lead agency may conclude that certain mitigation measures identified pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) are infeasible or otherwise undesirable. In those circumstances, the lead agency, prior to approving the project, may delete those mitigation measures and substitute for them other mitigation measures that the lead agency finds, after holding a public hearing on the matter, are equivalent or more effective in mitigating significant effects on the environment to a less than significant level and that do not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment. If those new mitigation measures are made conditions of project approval or are otherwise made part of the project approval, the deletion of the former measures and the substitution of the new mitigation measures shall not constitute an action or circumstance requiring recirculation of the mitigated negative declaration.
(g) Nothing in this section shall preclude a project applicant or any other person from challenging, in an administrative or judicial proceeding, the legality of a condition of project approval imposed by the lead agency. If, however, any condition of project approval set aside by either an administrative body or court was necessary to avoid or lessen the likelihood of the occurrence of a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency’s approval of the negative declaration and project shall be invalid and a new environmental review process shall be conducted before the project can be reapproved, unless the lead agency substitutes a new condition that the lead agency finds, after holding a public hearing on the matter, is equivalent to, or more effective in, lessening or avoiding significant effects on the environment and that does not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.

SEC. 3.

 Section 25556 is added to the Public Resources Code, to read:

25556.
 Any existing facility sited on, or any new facility proposed to be sited on, an active or closed military installation, which is substantially similar in design and operation to a facility that was approved by the commission before January 1, 2001, is eligible for expedited review under this chapter.